RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Animali Domestici
  4. » Feline look

 
Feline look...

Gatti

View gallery (5 photos)

Feline look sent on December 30, 2014 (15:13) by Alessandro Agrati. 7 comments, 546 views. [retina]

, 1/20 f/5.6, ISO 3200, hand held.

Prove di elaborazione raw ad alti iso applicando la riduzione del rumore. Si accettano consigli, che ho ancora molto da imparare! #gatti #cats



View High Resolution 16.3 MP  



What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 196000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




user46920
avatar
sent on January 24, 2015 (18:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

How do you feel with the fuji ??? ... And what software you use for the conversion ???

avatarjunior
sent on January 26, 2015 (0:55) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

We currently use GIMP + DCRAW for conversion. My hope is that soon some pious soul makes RawTherapee compatible with X-Trans sensor, I facilitate a little 'things preserving EXIF ??data. The fuji the'm still testing say, but at this time I also made some small photographic output by taking advantage of the good weather. The'm finding really convenient to regard the commands in manual. Having a little 'vintage optic, extension tubes etc. I'm also trying to do some macro.

user46920
avatar
sent on January 26, 2015 (7:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

This machine on the stand is just fantastic !!! ... The swiveling display is a must (now more), and in fact do not understand why they have not implemented even on XE2 wow!

Note the differences in sharpness and yield between the optical zoom and vintage home ??? ... From your photo looks very clean and perhaps sharper than a Nikkor 50 / 1.8 !!!

The EXIF ??data when using optical vintage, are quite skinny;-)

avatarjunior
sent on January 26, 2015 (9:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Even tweak? Of that goal I have heard a lot of good! The 16-50 seems very honest as sharpness. The optics vintage But pervettono blurred best, even when I'm using them to make macro (50mm canon FD on extension tubes). Actually the problem with exif data I have it with all optics, dcraw does not save its no data!

user46920
avatar
sent on January 26, 2015 (9:25) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

dcraw not save just no data!

... Then this is a problem wow!
Perhaps it is better to save raw + jpg and read data from jpg ...
But honest , it means better or worse optics vintage you ??? (Eg the FD 50 or more)
even tweak?
I'm talking about the series E-Ai

avatarjunior
sent on January 26, 2015 (21:23) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Considers that it is the first machine to interchangeable objectives that I have, so I go there with cautious judgments. I read reviews and reviews on the zoom in plastic kits, why I say that the 16-50 is honest. Optically I detected a heavy distortion on the vertical lines in the whole wide angle. For the rest of the performance is good, my initial tests were designed to evaluate the noise at high ISO making pictures in low light conditions, such as this one here. As optical vintage possess a canon FD 50mm F1.4, a panagor 28mm f 2.5 and a tele vivitar 200mm F3.5. I took some pictures with panagor but I did not seem exceptional, is faint but I admit to using it only af 2.8 f 4, perhaps more closed is better. 50 instead is the sharpest of all, also used very open. The canvasses the true pro, but not very balanced on XM1!

user46920
avatar
sent on January 27, 2015 (7:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Optically I detected a heavy distortion on the vertical lines in the whole wide angle
... which is why I never considered:-(

Can you tell me whether to 50mm zoom is better or worse ... the FD is compared to TA both, comparing them to F / 8 ???

is not very balanced on XM1!
...:-) In fact the baby was not born to mount tele 1Kg:-D



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me