RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Ritratto e Moda
  4. » thoughts

 
thoughts...

Ritratti

View gallery (2 photos)

thoughts sent on September 23, 2016 (16:41) by Raffasky. 14 comments, 363 views. [retina]

, 1/250 f/2.0, ISO 100, hand held. Roma, Italy.




View High Resolution 17.9 MP  

3 persons like it: Alesrog, Baribal, Razor1979


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 196000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on September 23, 2016 (18:10) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like the thoughtful expression and peaceful baby :-)
Maybe I gently closed the aperture to focus both eyes and I widened the frame on the left ;-)

David

avatarsenior
sent on September 23, 2016 (18:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Quoto Baribal: it sees very limited pdc.
Also cutting head does not convince me, you were on the right space for better reaching the subject.
Beautiful still caught the moment and the natural expression, even the detachment of plans like.

avatarjunior
sent on September 23, 2016 (19:02) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Thanks Baribal and Kun,
the expression is the thing that struck me and I like
shoot at f / 2.0 is a challenge I wanted to take, it is not easy.
A less homogeneous background would help him blurry?
For the framing you, I have no excuse, it's just wrong.


avatarsenior
sent on September 23, 2016 (22:38) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Yes, a background further away and less plate would have helped a lot.
It is difficult to manage the depth of field, it is true, especially when all make you shoot at full aperture.
With a homogeneous background, if the light allows, I would aim of an abundant pdc to get around the face in focus, the bokeh on a white wall is not seen.
In other cases the talk change, but I always tend to have at least both eyes in focus.
With a 85 equivalent it could also mean F3.5 .. Or f4 depending on the distance.

avatarsenior
sent on September 23, 2016 (23:05) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

We assume that the portrait I like, but ...
-L'inquadratura Is wrong, you should not cut hair, hand, etc. I would have enlarged a bit.
-We Wanted a more suitable background ... the sofa with behind the wall is not the best, even if you've tried to hide it with a bokeh pushed.
Light instead I like, simple, very soft, with no harsh shadows but just to give depth to the face. A bit 'too much from above ... and this has generated a shadow a bit' ugly under eyes.
Finally the expression is peculiar, you picked a fine time.
This photo I like more than others ... some hints, trying to better treat these 3 aspects: light, framing and background.

avatarsenior
sent on September 23, 2016 (23:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

quoto Razor for defects ... the classical expression is still very nice.
Hello Ale!

user81257
avatar
sent on September 24, 2016 (10:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Good focus, f / 2 is not easy to center the eye if you do not have hands.
But I do not like the cut, too much space above and the photo is definitely underexposed and with wrong colors (has skin that tends to red). Probably the wrong white balance.
They are not easy portraits, I myself am not capable, it takes a lot a lot of experience.
Good expression.

avatarsenior
sent on September 24, 2016 (11:49) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Expression, Maf and unfocused good ... but the cut is wrong and I am not convinced the white balance, I think, very cold

avatarsenior
sent on September 24, 2016 (12:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Selective focus is definitely a great tool, but in this case it would be better to try to have both eyes on fire. Even the cutting of a hair piece is a flaw in terms of composition ...

avatarsenior
sent on September 24, 2016 (13:39) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The pose is pretty good. A smaller aperture would put a sharper focus his eyes. The point sharper focus seem to me the hair.
It is tight on the left, is not a problem for me, it is more ugly all white at the top.
In the portrait it is important to make a good background.

avatarsenior
sent on September 24, 2016 (15:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I like the pose, the light and selective focus.
I do not like the picture, in my opinion completely wrong. The cut wrist, the subject shifted to the left in a vertical cut and the top unnecessarily empty in my opinion are the major flaws of this photo.

avatarsupporter
sent on September 25, 2016 (7:47) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Bravo model, not the photographer.
Have one eye focused works but not with her face almost parallel to the focal plane, the framing is wrong a bit around, the background does not work as blurry with a 50 by opening all badly you fail in this situation an average wanted us canvas to blur the background.

avatarsenior
sent on September 25, 2016 (11:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello Raffasky share but do not repeat the criticisms that you have already been made. The face is well lit but the rest of the head has very closed shadows. Overall I think a stop in over exposure would not hurt.

avatarjunior
sent on September 26, 2016 (14:18) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

3E
@ Arci I wish I had decided to have one eye on fire! I overestimate thanks :-P



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me