RCE Foto






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm


  1. Galleries
  2. »
  3. Uccelli
  4. » The force

 
The force...

Oasi di Sant'Alessio

View gallery (21 photos)



PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »


What do you think about this photo?


Do you have questions or curiosities about this image? Do you want to ask something to the author, give him suggestions for improvement, or congratulate for a photo that you really like?


You can do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 195000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.




avatarsenior
sent on September 11, 2013 (19:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Beautiful image, transmits all the power with the look, shame about the wings clipped, if I could fit everything in the frame would be perfect.

Hello

avatarsupporter
sent on September 11, 2013 (19:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Vampy Hello, thank you!
I know you're right, but I was not able to compose the scene so quickly, he moved immediately:-P

avatarsenior
sent on September 11, 2013 (19:51) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

If you have applied for a reduction in noise over the entire photograph?

avatarsupporter
sent on September 11, 2013 (19:58) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Yes, but very light

avatarsenior
sent on September 11, 2013 (20:11) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I see the feathers of the back with little detail, then perhaps needed a shutter speed faster.

avatarsenior
sent on September 14, 2013 (22:36) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

The force put forever in a cage and laced to the legs ... poor eagle :-( :-( :-(
How sad that I bring these images and certainly not your fault Vampy.

avatarsenior
sent on September 14, 2013 (22:50) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Antonio I simply judge the photos below a technical level, the ethical let him lose because there is too much hypocrisy ......


avatarsenior
sent on September 15, 2013 (0:07) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I meant no fault of yours Nikcola ... I do not know why but I thought you were the author of the shot.
I in these events I see a lot of hypocrisy and so much fake love for animals with human caresses have nothing to do ... nor even with cages, laces and caps.
Technically there is little to comment because the animal is there practically "stuffed" and tied

avatarsenior
sent on September 15, 2013 (0:41) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

I see no hypocrisy in these comments, what does it mean that technically there is little to comment??? But it is a photograph or a painting?, And so there is a technical side to force comment.

I know so many phenomena that even if the animal is and they have thousands of euro of equipment are capable of cannarla without delay ..... So the fact that they do not mean nothing, but the pose seems typical of Dell'acquila that is detaching the flight so there was also a timing that was perfect.

If we quell'anellino it has on the paw gets rid of all the technicality .... be 'this for me and do not open Pandora's Box ...

Hello manuel

avatarsenior
sent on September 15, 2013 (10:16) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

F You seem natural that, too? Have you ever seen how beautiful the beak of an eagle free? Well this seems almost as poor in lipstick that is unnaturally perfect beak. An eagle in the wild is a great war machine has been converted to a chicken who would not know how to extricate themselves out of that perch or 20 meters from the jailer that nearly cue.
Hypocrite?? Well said by any Vampy not make me hurt so much, in your opinion is detaching the flight? Well it seems a bit too unbalanced and back with an unnatural position.

avatarsenior
sent on September 15, 2013 (10:28) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Antonio quoto even the commas and add, I do not want the author of the photo, I've always found it a bit 'sad photograph similar scenes (no technical difficulty, no preparation etc.etc.), Rather than emphasize the majesty of an animal I think would be nice to highlight the cruelty and insensitivity of the human ...
Ps: I have never worn, and never will, my kids to the circus and the zoo for even the sadness and anger that send me ... Sorry for the hypocrisy ...

avatarsenior
sent on September 15, 2013 (10:29) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Pps: I'd move from the "birds" to "pets", it seems more appropriate ...

avatarsupporter
sent on September 15, 2013 (10:35) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

hello antonio, well. I see a kind of needless controversy in my opinion. morally I think you're right that no one likes to see an animal tied or so on, but we are talking about photography. There are around thousands of photographs that may not like it, but they tell a fact or a story and that's what the picture has to tell us. While this shot may not like it either, but technically I look at it and recognize certain qualities in nikcola in executing the shot. ok guys greetings to all bye :-)

avatarsenior
sent on September 15, 2013 (10:56) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

but we are talking about photography

Exactly, I do not think that when it comes to photography, there is only the technical aspect to evaluate, or not?

avatarsenior
sent on September 15, 2013 (11:40) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Accept this kind of photo-shooting only as a document to understand what 'captivity for certain species. A golden eagle, a hawk, an owl and many other species are deprived of their peculiarities ... I told you everything.
I hope that all parents follow the example of Viper so stop with this sad little theaters.
Nikcola I repeat I have nothing against you

avatarmoderator
sent on September 15, 2013 (11:46) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Good maf.
Sorry Nikcola but overall the picture does not convince me for these reasons:
- Wings sharply cut
- Loss of detail with noise reduction even on the wings
- Roost ugly - cut from the leg
- Little space where the bird of prey was addressed.
Tips:
- More exploits the potentials of a superzoom focal researching the wiser
- Do not abuse with the iso
- If you want to start a nature trail begins to attend the true nature reserves managed by Lipu and wwf in your area.
hello and good light, laurel

avatarsupporter
sent on September 15, 2013 (12:24) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

Hello everyone, I rise to the dutiful clarification. The place where I took the photo and 'the oasis of sant'alessio, a natural oasis (also known place already from the forum) where animals are basically free and non-alloy specimens have a clinic for wounded and recovered. The photos I've taken during a demonstration / lecture on birds of prey in which they WERE NOT ABSOLUTELY LINKED, proof and 'the fact that I could not take the animal as a whole. Dell oasis and the staff 'very attentive and knowledgeable and has at heart the welfare of the animals. Among the other was full of photographers with equipment that I can only dream of me and organize photography workshops and study of animals. Hello

avatarsenior
sent on September 15, 2013 (12:31) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

substantially free?? But you had blinders on?? Maybe we have a different concept of freedom wow.
However I do not mind the picture hello Roby

avatarsenior
sent on September 15, 2013 (12:32) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

How much hypocrisy!! I bet that when you turn on your nice car pollutant or buy your beautiful goals that were built in a factory that uses the power of a nuclear power plant that resulted in the deaths of who knows how many animals because of leaking radiation from the Japanese reactor Your naturalistic sense goes out the window ......

If we be extremists and then better be consistently not where it is convenient.

You add that maybe we should also complain when you see the dog with the leash .... I do not think that a dog is less than one eagles an owl or any other animal ....

avatarsenior
sent on September 15, 2013 (13:00) | This comment has been automatically translated (show/hide original)

How much confusion dear Vampy! What has now respect for the environment and the ecosystem with respect for the dignity and freedom of all living beings? The fact that I contribute discrete measure to increase the levels of greenhouse gases and harmful substances in our planet automatically preclude me the opportunity to experience discomfort in seeing an animal, even if a rat, deprived of his freedom and dignity? That is, according to your reasoning, even if I struggle to define that, seen that inquino are hypocritical if front of a bull, for example, horrified. I think the last time you went skiing you had forgotten at home the helmet and the last drop was devastating ... :-D

Regarding the fact that dogs have the same dignity of an eagle (you write without "cq") seems to me a baality disconcerting as it is obvious. It upsets me to see them on a leash and how, but since there is no limit to imbecility of the human being and the people, especially in cities, he says, on a whim, or worse, to want to close that animals should live in an environment with open spaces and green rather than in the apartment and in the middle of the concrete, as a matter of civil life are tied. On dogs with me backgrounds an open door, I think that would prohibit by law even pet shops / farms ...
And anyway, without demeaning or belittling the dignity of the dog, including a pet (thousands of years of cohabitation with the man made him lose the characteristics of a wild animal in nature and would make it very difficult to survive on its own), and a bird of prey, some difference, about cages and ropes, there must be, or not?




PAGE: ALL PAGES | NEXT PAGE »



Some comments may have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.  Microsoft Translator



 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me