The Fujifilm XF 35mm f/2 R WR is a standard lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2015. The focus is done by Lens AF motor (Stepper Motor), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 398 €;
58 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10.
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 196000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Pros: sharp, small and lightweight, very good image quality, low CA, weather seling, fair price
Cons: the hood... tiny plastic joke :) Check the 35/1.4, looking cool.
Opinion: Use a Fuji Xpro2, not a perfect lens, but the image quality is fine, sharp on F2 with low chromatic aberration, bokeh is good. F4 is super sharp with 0 CA, cool. Bonus specs for this price the weather sealing. So, I think this sweet lens Very Recommended, if you don't need a bigger 35/1.4 and the plus bokeh. Every Fuji photographer bag need this lens. :)
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Character and personality-free as about 95% of Fujifilm digital ml optics, indecent distortion from wide-angle pushed by 30 euros, free of three-dimensionality, free of contrast
Opinion:I took with Fujifilm for years also on a professional level, then I moved to Leica. If it is true that good photography can also be done with a compact 50 euros, it is true that there must be pleasure in photographing (since it is not a question of splitting stones). I say that perfection (so sought after in the modern amateur...) is boring. Perfection in photography is a tedious flaw that only leads to long yawns. Having said that I can say that one of the favorite optics is the Simmicron 50mm/2 Rigid, optics far from perfect, but with character to sell. It is a poetic glass, which gives emotions. The opposite is the opposite of about 95% of modern Fujifilm optics. The latter, designed for that segment of amateurs or professionals who would like to shoot with Leica but who are unable or not able to have the portfolio, were conceived more with aesthetic than qualitative benefits. Having been shooting for years with Fujifilm I can say that I rarely had to deal with valid optics. Mostly they are lenses that work when shooting in jpeg, with all internal processor fixes. As soon as you shoot in raw... here comes the donkey. Distortions, lack of contrast, lack of resolution... In short, bottle funds designed exclusively to be processed by the machine. Not to mention the lack of character. Optical without personality, that bore, that make you pass the desire to photograph. And this 35mm is the summary of all these flaws, a trivial optics, which has distortion even if it was an old 24mm stall, of those you buy and use once. I shoot exclusively in raw, if I want to shoot in jpeg I use the mobile phone or the compact. If I use a Fujifilm I want to have total control over the image. After years of digital Leica and film I filmed an XE2s and this 35mm... bà, it made me return the desire for analog, where the final quality is given exclusively by glass and film.
Pros:Constructive quality, silence and compactness
Cons:In certain conditions of light aberration of color at full opening at close range
Opinion:I bought it back, after selling it in favor of the 35 f1.4, taking advantage of Black Friday at a super advantageous price, Fujifilm Italia guarantee. I missed it even though I think the first copy wasn't excellent. This copy amazes! Mounted on the X-H1 I didn't remember it so quiet and precise and sharp. Compared to 35 f1.4, it offers warmer colors with the same settings. I find it very beautiful, tropicalized, internal focus, a jewel. I decided to keep both 35 f1.4 and f2. Magic both!
Pros:Compactness, solid construction, WR, good image quality, autofocus, diaphragm diaphragm diaphragm diaphragm with directions and right calibration.
Cons:no one in particular.
Opinion:It is a useful way forward; it doesn't clutter or weigh. It is very good in terms of image quality; as much as it may interest it is sharp and quite contrasted. Honestly, having even the 50 mm on FF , I do not think it is perfectly equivalent to a 50 1.8 because the 35 has something different that makes it special and maybe a classic 50 1.8 on full frame retains a bit of advantage in the blur, if we want to be fussy. The autofocus is very quiet; The MF is good though by-wire and the dial is very small. Very good diaframmi diaphragm diaphragm diaphragm, which does not move indefinitely as on 10-24 and has the correct indication of the opening value. I would say that overall it is a very balanced and well-corrected objective. I did not notice any particular difficulties or aberrations in the backlight. The price is commensurate with the quality also constructive.
Opinion:I've been using it for several months now. It is a lightweight and versatile small optic, and also has a fast and precise autofocus even in extreme light conditions. Nitido already at full open. Mounted on xt-3 I use it as a primary optics for street and portraits. It never betrays, the price is in line with the build quality. I don't mind the lampshade.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.