The Fujifilm XC 50-230mm f/4.5-6.7 OIS is a tele lens for APS-C, manufactured from 2013 to 2015 (discontinued). The focus is done by Lens AF motor (non-ultrasonic), it has image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 294 €;
12 users have given it an average vote of 9.4 out of 10.
This lens is available with the following mounts:
Fujifilm X-mount: this lens is compatible with mirrorless APS-C Fuji.
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 195000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Cons:Plasticous and delicate, dark, lack aperture ring
Opinion:I tried this lens and I reviewed it for RCE as a travel lens to combine with a 18/55 and a xt20. A light and qualitatively satisfactory kit in my opinion. A kit and a lens then thought for those who maybe part with the family and want to be covered a little ' on all focal. The focal excursion is "important", a 230 on app-C is equivalent to 345mm; Of course the lens is a bit ' dark but has behaved well in dark environments also because raising the ISO of xt20 (which holds them well), practically, the problem most often is solved. In my opinion, for the price to which it is, it is worth buying it if one is not a professional and does not seek the advertising magnification. Below I will post the link of my review on YouTube; While some photos made with the 50-230, you will find it in a special gallery on my profile https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fyb--vb4oug&t=480s
Opinion:Purchased used, but in excellent condition 150 EUR and applies them all either positive or negative. I never liked the paintings, fattostà that of Canon I've never had one, here I wanted to try and I must say I was impressed. It was dark (and here is worth 150 € in negative) but as long as there is light does not weigh you and photos are full of detail (which is the value of € 150 in the positive views that churns out the photos!). Sore point the lens hood, it will ruin watching it and ..... seems to 230mm Captain Hook from extending the barrel and hood hat put there before.
Opinion:I took this zoom lens used but practically new to the incredible figure of 100 € .Consigliato who does not want svenarsi for 55-200 that is not 'comparable (for quality and price) .There and' suitable for night street because it's too dark and it manages to connect the Af.Su a tripod makes its final lavoro.Paraluce plasticoso.In straconsigliato
Pros:Optical quality, price, weight, color rendering, stabilizer
Cons:Hood that breaks easily, too plasticky
Opinion:A great lens in relation to the price. Paid about 170 euro used has an excellent color rendering and a good stabilizer. I really like how rende.rnCapace also a decent bokeh considered the diaphragm. In reality there is only valid in relation to the price, the series "Who has satisfied ..", but it's really a great goal. I imagine that the 55-200 is a lama..ma the price goes up a lot, even nell'usato.rnrnIn many situations I find it even more powerful of 18-55.rnrn
Pros:Excursion - Weight - Stabilizer - quality / price ratio
Cons:Dark Dark Dark - Plastic Bayonet
Opinion:I have recently, but it's hard to go wrong a photo. Good autofocus, sharpness and contrast. Excellent hiking and stabilizer. plastic material for me in this case is considered a PRO if you mount the X-E1 for low weight. Value for money unbeatable I think. For those who do not know: it lacks the aperture ring that have the XF-series lenses. The opening command has been moved on the wheel.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.