The Nikon Coolpix P900 is a compact camera with 1/2.3" (5.6x) sensor and 16 megapixels manufactured from 2015 to 2018 (discontinued). The range of sensitivities, including ISO extension, is 100 - 6400 ISO and it has a continuous shooting (burst mode) of 7 FPS. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 540 €;
22 users have given it an average vote of 8.3 out of 10
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 196000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
Opinion: This camera has a good lens with stabilizing that works very well. On the other hand it has a small sensor that limits the image quality. But all in all it is a good poor mans choice for long range bird and wildlife camera. For the price it would not be fair to ask for more in this camera. If you want to get into bird and wildlife photography without spending a years salary on it this is probably your best option.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Extraordinary focal length, excellent stabilization, good optics
Cons:low autonomy, a lot of plastic, lack of raw
Opinion:I'm sorry where to contradict the many shop professionals, who are a bit behind and afflicted by a quality concept anchored to the A2 press, but these megazoom bridges and in particular the P900 open up completely new horizons to photography. Of course the sensors are small and the noise grows with Iso, even if the speech is much more complex and a backlit sensor is worth the same as one with the circulation in the head, but offer the possibility of shots impossible with any camera unless you spend as if to buy a car and still resort to delusive optical gimmicks for image quality. I bought the P900 as a complement to the photographic kit and I must say that even in general use does not disfigure at all, even if its specific use is naturalistic and allow allows to capture from a distance details that with "normal" machines would require a strong cropping and thus rebalancing the quality. Of course it is better not to exceed 400 ISO, but in its limit allows cotherwise impossible. The only real flaw is the lack of the raw format that does not allow a proper post production
Pros:Few pro and a lot of shit in this camera. Positive is the very long focal excursion and the really good stabilization. Even in the video works well.
Cons:The viewfinder is somewhat inoperable. Good, inaccurate, small, practically unusable. Focusing is decent only with plenty of light, but it gets lowered and less focuses, until it no longer works in darkness. The zoom It is slow. There is no raw file. The quality is good at 100 iso, but beyond it is significantly worse. With the arrival of the heat the rubber coatings are all detached. The battery life is too limited.
Opinion:I was thinking of purchasing a great bridge bridge camera, but I'm really wrong. There are a lot of defects for a device that has a definitely high price and has very heavy sides like the totally inadequate viewfinder, poor batteries and more. It's a Camera that does not compare with other people of the same type. Also I had to replace, just bought, the sensor because it blurred.
Pros:incredible zoom range, excellent stabilizer for a bridge, relatively compact and lightweight
Cons:battery life, a little too plastic, unusable beyond ISO 400 unless there is a good light, very mediocre viewfinder
Opinion:I've had it about a year as a walking handyman or when I do not want weight. The qualities are these: really good lens with an amazing zoom range up to 2000 mm Equival. with excellent stabilizer, provided there is a good light. If the light is bad better leave it at home, or not exceed 100 ISO! RnI defects are those of a bridge that so I am not to list. The display can be seen well only if there is bright light. Better instead give up the viewfinder. The aperture range is poor, since the 400-500mm you work only at f / 6.3 and changing the exposure you have to work only on the timing because in these cases not funzioba the over / under intentional exposure. So in summary: build quality 7, 8 optical quality, stabilizer 9
Pros:Excursion and quality 'zoom, excellent stabilizer, quality' very good pictures at low ISO, shots still decent though perfectly exposed up to 1600 ISO articulated enough as Screen resolution and luminosita'.Comandi properly disposed.
Cons:EVF sore diposto and resolution stereo migliorabile.Microfoni entered in the same pallet in the flash.Autofocus slow video
Opinion:Okay as a handyman machine: with the extension zoon 24-2000 compared to 35mm, I photographed freehand formed the moon (a dream I had in the drawer for years) thanks to the truly effective stabilizer I made shots free from blur and camera shake .In the video quality 'good but slow autofocus and sound absolutely insufficente.I microphones in flash scoop absorb spurious vibration generating a really bad sound, I tried to reduce vibration by placing the adhesive pads between the flash and its headquarters, result: vibration greatly reduced but still isufficente audio !! to the top of bidges Nikon is not the best, however, do 8 to quality 'constructive and result fotgrafico.PS:Il my usual outfit consists of canon 20D (soon replaced by 80D) 18- 200 -17-50 Tamron Tamron 2.8 -50 1.8 canon.
The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.